Comments on: STOMP Clarification http://hiramchirino.com/blog/2009/09/stomp-clarification/ My Ramblings on Hawt Tech Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:57:58 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: benjaminws http://hiramchirino.com/blog/2009/09/stomp-clarification/comment-page-1/#comment-37 benjaminws Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:24:02 +0000 http://hiramchirino.com/wordpress/2009/09/stomp-clarification/#comment-37 I'll agree with your statement about the newline after the terminator being natural. I assumed that because the newline wasn't specified in the protocol, that it wasn't supposed to be there.<br /><br />In all honesty, this is such a small problem, that it didn't bother me that much to just account for both cases in code.<br /><br />It would be really nice if every implementation followed the spec to the letter, but even if it were more finely grained in detail, it probably wouldn't happen.<br /><br />I like your description and think it would be helpful to add that to the documentation. I'll agree with your statement about the newline after the terminator being natural. I assumed that because the newline wasn't specified in the protocol, that it wasn't supposed to be there.

In all honesty, this is such a small problem, that it didn't bother me that much to just account for both cases in code.

It would be really nice if every implementation followed the spec to the letter, but even if it were more finely grained in detail, it probably wouldn't happen.

I like your description and think it would be helpful to add that to the documentation.

]]>