Comments on: New Checksum Plugin http://hiramchirino.com/blog/2008/08/new-checksum-plugin/ My Ramblings on Hawt Tech Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:27:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Hiram Chirino http://hiramchirino.com/blog/2008/08/new-checksum-plugin/comment-page-1/#comment-27 Hiram Chirino Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:00:00 +0000 http://hiramchirino.com/wordpress/2008/08/new-checksum-plugin/#comment-27 Brett, Thanks will update soon.<br/><br/>Jukka, actually no, not so rare when you consider that it happens every time in a reactor build. Since the checksum for those locally built dependencies will change with each built, you can specify that the checksum for that dependency is '*'.<br/><br/>The other odd bit is that the version number for reactor dependencies will change as part of the release process, so you can also use '*' for the dependency version number. Brett, Thanks will update soon.

Jukka, actually no, not so rare when you consider that it happens every time in a reactor build. Since the checksum for those locally built dependencies will change with each built, you can specify that the checksum for that dependency is ‘*’.

The other odd bit is that the version number for reactor dependencies will change as part of the release process, so you can also use ‘*’ for the dependency version number.

]]> By: Jukka http://hiramchirino.com/blog/2008/08/new-checksum-plugin/comment-page-1/#comment-26 Jukka Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:28:00 +0000 http://hiramchirino.com/wordpress/2008/08/new-checksum-plugin/#comment-26 What about if I rebuild the dependency locally? I guess that's a rare case.<br/><br/>BR,<br/><br/>Jukka Zitting What about if I rebuild the dependency locally? I guess that’s a rare case.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

]]> By: brettporter http://hiramchirino.com/blog/2008/08/new-checksum-plugin/comment-page-1/#comment-25 brettporter Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:12:00 +0000 http://hiramchirino.com/wordpress/2008/08/new-checksum-plugin/#comment-25 Nice :)<br/><br/>You can add @requiresDependencyResolution to the mojo annotations and use it as early as you like.<br/><br/>I would probably also split the common functionality into an abstract base mojo for less confusion rather than one extending the other. Nice :)

You can add @requiresDependencyResolution to the mojo annotations and use it as early as you like.

I would probably also split the common functionality into an abstract base mojo for less confusion rather than one extending the other.

]]>